D09 — Self-Harm Pathway
AI as Substitute for Human Crisis Support
Description
The person relies on AI instead of crisis lines, clinicians, family, friends, or emergency support.
Rationale
Substituting AI for human crisis support removes the most important intervention resource available during a suicidal crisis: a real person who can assess, connect, refer, and respond. This substitution may reflect distrust of humans, fear of consequences, or simply the 24/7 availability of AI. Whatever the reason, it represents a critical gap in the safety net.
Evidence Base
Performance of mental health chatbot agents in detecting and managing suicidal ideation
W. Pichowicz, M. Kotas & P. Piotrowski, 2024. Performance of mental health chatbot agents in detecting and managing suicidal ideation. Scientific Reports, 15(31652), pages. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17242-4
Peer-reviewed study (original research)Inside a Mass Shooter’s Harrowing History With ChatGPT
Mark Follman, 2024. Inside a Mass Shooter’s Harrowing History With ChatGPT. Mother Jones.
News / journalismEvaluating Alignment between Large Language Models and Expert Clinicians in Suicide Risk Assessment
McBain, R. K., Cantor, J. H., Zhang, L. A., Baker, O., Zhang, F., Burnett, A., Kofner, A., Breslau, J., Stein, B. D., Mehrotra, A., & Yu, H., 2024. Evaluating Alignment between Large Language Models and Expert Clinicians in Suicide Risk Assessment. Psychiatr Serv, 76(11), 944–950. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.20250086.
Peer-reviewed study (original research)“You Need to Drop the App”: Online Community Responses to Teens’ Disclosures of Overreliance on AI Companion Chatbots
Mohammad (Matt) Namvarpour, Ananya Mhetras, Jessica Y Medina, Mamtaj Akter, and Afsaneh Razi, 2026. “You Need to Drop the App”: Online Community Responses to Teens’ Disclosures of Overreliance on AI Companion Chatbots. In ACM Conversational User Interfaces 2026 (CUI ’26), July 21–24, 2026, Bremen, Germany. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3816046.3816214
Peer-reviewed study (original research)AI Chatbot Suicide Risk Detection and Response: Human Validation Study of the Open-Source VERA-MH Safety Evaluation
Bentley K H, Belli L, Chekroud A M, Ward E J, Dworkin E R, Van Ark E, Johnston K M, Alexander W, Brown M, Hawrilenko M, 2024. AI Chatbot Suicide Risk Detection and Response: Human Validation Study of the Open-Source VERA-MH Safety Evaluation. JMIR AI, 5(e92817). doi: 10.2196/92817.
Peer-reviewed study (original research)Evaluating a Consumer LLM for Suicide Risk Response Calibration: A Pilot Study
Keskin Y, Park T, Bozkurt S, 2024. Evaluating a Consumer LLM for Suicide Risk Response Calibration: A Pilot Study. IOS Press, 2026, pages 1009-1013. doi:10.3233/SHTI260331
Peer-reviewed study (original research)It Is the Journey, Not the Destination: Moving From End Points to Trajectories When Assessing Chatbot Mental Health Safety
Morrin H, Au Yeung J, Agnew Z, Østergaard SD, Pollak TA, 2024. It Is the Journey, Not the Destination: Moving From End Points to Trajectories When Assessing Chatbot Mental Health Safety. JMIR Ment Health, 13(e91454). https://doi.org/10.2196/91454
Commentary / EditorialAI Mental Health Apps: A Risk Assessment
Common Sense Media Youth AI Safety Institute, 2024. AI Mental Health Apps: A Risk Assessment. Common Sense Media.
Government / agency reportSuicide and self-harm in the age of generative artificial intelligence: The case of ChatGPT and rise of suicide-related lawsuits
Muhammad Ittefaq, Rauf Arif, Shafiq Ahmad Kamboh, 2026. Suicide and self-harm in the age of generative artificial intelligence: The case of ChatGPT and rise of suicide-related lawsuits. Journal of Affective Disorders, 411, 122025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.122025
Peer-reviewed study (original research)Independent Clinical Evaluation of General-Purpose LLM Responses to Signals of Suicide Risk
Judd N., Vaz A., Paeth K., Davis L. I., Esherick M., Brand J., Amaro I., Rousmaniere T., 2024. Independent Clinical Evaluation of General-Purpose LLM Responses to Signals of Suicide Risk. Proceedings of the Second International Association for Safe and Ethical AI Conference (IASEAI’26), 279.
Peer-reviewed study (original research)When patients consult artificial intelligence before clinicians: restoring clinical prioritisation in mental health care
Yudai Kaneda, 2026. When patients consult artificial intelligence before clinicians: restoring clinical prioritisation in mental health care. The British Journal of Psychiatry, First View, pp. 1 - 2. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2026.10741
Commentary / Editorial