D12 — Data Reliability, Ethics, and Assessment Limits

D12-E08

Need for Specialist Review

Description

Clinical, legal, forensic, AI safety, cybersecurity, or ethics consultation may be needed.

Rationale

No single evaluator has expertise across all the domains relevant to AIR-SPJ: clinical psychiatry, threat assessment, AI systems, cybersecurity, forensic practice, and ethics. Identifying when specialist consultation is needed — and documenting that recommendation — is an ethical and professional obligation, not an admission of inadequacy.

Evidence Base

  • Inside a Mass Shooter’s Harrowing History With ChatGPT

    Mark Follman, 2024. Inside a Mass Shooter’s Harrowing History With ChatGPT. Mother Jones.

    News / journalism
  • Ex Machina: A forensic evaluation of AI companion applications and their evidentiary value

    Kendall J. Comeaux, Trevor T. Spinosa, Ali Ghosn, Ibrahim Baggili, 2024. Ex Machina: A forensic evaluation of AI companion applications and their evidentiary value. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 56, 302050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2026.302050

    Peer-reviewed study (original research)
This platform is NOT a scoring engine, diagnostic tool, or risk prediction system. It is a research and evidence-mapping tool to support the transparent development of an SPJ framework.